From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] KVM support for 1GB pages Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:49:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20090622094953.GE5139@amd.com> References: <1245417389-5527-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4A3CC1FA.2070900@redhat.com> <20090622094013.GD5139@amd.com> <4A3F524C.8030902@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from sg2ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.51.79]:8853 "EHLO SG2EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751261AbZFVJvb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:51:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A3F524C.8030902@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:43:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/22/2009 12:40 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >>> Can you describe how the code fails with shadow paging? >>> =20 >> >> After the rework it even fails to boot a guest with gbpages enabled.= This week >> is a bit tight but I will debug this further next week. >> =20 > > Does the failure happen only when both guest/host use gbpages, or doe= s =20 > it also happen if gbpages is disabled on either one? It happens only when the guest uses gbpages. If I disable them at boot = the linux guest boots fine and runs stable. Joerg --=20 | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Operating | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach bei M=FCnchen System |=20 Research | Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis M=FCnchen | Registergericht M=FCnchen, HRB Nr. 43632