* [PATCH] Cleanup cpu loop
@ 2009-06-18 12:22 Gleb Natapov
2009-06-22 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gleb Natapov @ 2009-06-18 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: avi; +Cc: kvm
Rearrange cpu loop to be (hopefully) more readable. Put difference
between kernel/userspace irqchip in one place.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index 4129fe2..72a081d 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -1746,15 +1746,9 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
return 0;
}
-static int has_work(CPUState *env)
+static int is_cpu_stopped(CPUState *env)
{
- if (!vm_running || (env && env->kvm_cpu_state.stopped))
- return 0;
- if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context))
- return 1;
- if (!env->halted)
- return 1;
- return kvm_arch_has_work(env);
+ return !vm_running || env->kvm_cpu_state.stopped;
}
static void flush_queued_work(CPUState *env)
@@ -1877,6 +1871,8 @@ static void update_regs_for_init(CPUState *env)
#endif
cpu_reset(env);
+ /* cpu_reset() clears env->halted, cpu should be halted after init */
+ env->halted = 1;
#ifdef TARGET_I386
/* restore SIPI vector */
@@ -1920,6 +1916,16 @@ static void qemu_kvm_system_reset(void)
resume_all_threads();
}
+static void process_irqchip_events(CPUState *env)
+{
+ if (env->kvm_cpu_state.init)
+ update_regs_for_init(env);
+ if (env->kvm_cpu_state.sipi_needed)
+ update_regs_for_sipi(env);
+ if (kvm_arch_has_work(env))
+ env->halted = 0;
+}
+
static int kvm_main_loop_cpu(CPUState *env)
{
setup_kernel_sigmask(env);
@@ -1935,19 +1941,14 @@ static int kvm_main_loop_cpu(CPUState *env)
kvm_arch_load_regs(env);
while (1) {
- while (!has_work(env))
- kvm_main_loop_wait(env, 1000);
- if (env->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD | CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI))
- env->halted = 0;
- if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context)) {
- if (env->kvm_cpu_state.init)
- update_regs_for_init(env);
- if (env->kvm_cpu_state.sipi_needed)
- update_regs_for_sipi(env);
+ int run_cpu = is_cpu_stopped(env) ? 0 : 1;
+ if (run_cpu && !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context)) {
+ process_irqchip_events(env);
+ run_cpu = !env->halted;
}
- if (!env->halted || kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context))
- kvm_cpu_exec(env);
- kvm_main_loop_wait(env, 0);
+ kvm_main_loop_wait(env, run_cpu ? 0 : 1000);
+ if (run_cpu)
+ kvm_cpu_exec(env);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&qemu_mutex);
return 0;
--
Gleb.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Cleanup cpu loop
2009-06-18 12:22 [PATCH] Cleanup cpu loop Gleb Natapov
@ 2009-06-22 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-06-22 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gleb Natapov; +Cc: kvm
On 06/18/2009 03:22 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Rearrange cpu loop to be (hopefully) more readable. Put difference
> between kernel/userspace irqchip in one place.
>
>
> static void flush_queued_work(CPUState *env)
> @@ -1877,6 +1871,8 @@ static void update_regs_for_init(CPUState *env)
> #endif
>
> cpu_reset(env);
> + /* cpu_reset() clears env->halted, cpu should be halted after init */
> + env->halted = 1;
>
How does that work for the boot cpu?
> static int kvm_main_loop_cpu(CPUState *env)
> {
> setup_kernel_sigmask(env);
> @@ -1935,19 +1941,14 @@ static int kvm_main_loop_cpu(CPUState *env)
> kvm_arch_load_regs(env);
>
> while (1) {
> - while (!has_work(env))
> - kvm_main_loop_wait(env, 1000);
> - if (env->interrupt_request& (CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD | CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI))
> - env->halted = 0;
> - if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context)) {
> - if (env->kvm_cpu_state.init)
> - update_regs_for_init(env);
> - if (env->kvm_cpu_state.sipi_needed)
> - update_regs_for_sipi(env);
> + int run_cpu = is_cpu_stopped(env) ? 0 : 1;
>
run_cpu = !is_cpu_stopped()
> + if (run_cpu&& !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context)) {
> + process_irqchip_events(env);
> + run_cpu = !env->halted;
> }
> - if (!env->halted || kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context))
> - kvm_cpu_exec(env);
> - kvm_main_loop_wait(env, 0);
> + kvm_main_loop_wait(env, run_cpu ? 0 : 1000);
> + if (run_cpu)
> + kvm_cpu_exec(env);
> }
>
A single conditional may be clearer:
if (run_cpu)
kvm_main_loop_wait(0)
kvm_cpu_exec()
else
kvm_main_loop_wait(1000)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Cleanup cpu loop
2009-06-22 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2009-06-22 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gleb Natapov @ 2009-06-22 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: kvm
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/18/2009 03:22 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> Rearrange cpu loop to be (hopefully) more readable. Put difference
>> between kernel/userspace irqchip in one place.
>>
>>
>> static void flush_queued_work(CPUState *env)
>> @@ -1877,6 +1871,8 @@ static void update_regs_for_init(CPUState *env)
>> #endif
>>
>> cpu_reset(env);
>> + /* cpu_reset() clears env->halted, cpu should be halted after init */
>> + env->halted = 1;
>>
>
> How does that work for the boot cpu?
void kvm_apic_init(CPUState *env)
{
if (env->cpu_index != 0)
env->kvm_cpu_state.init = 1;
kvm_update_interrupt_request(env);
}
Boot cpu does not get here.
--
Gleb.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-22 13:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-18 12:22 [PATCH] Cleanup cpu loop Gleb Natapov
2009-06-22 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox