From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v9 5/5] KVM: create irqfd-cleanup-wq on demand Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:50:45 +0300 Message-ID: <20090706165045.GF12399@redhat.com> References: <20090702153454.20186.99191.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090702153821.20186.9344.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090706155850.GA12399@redhat.com> <4A522050.7030200@novell.com> <20090706161444.GC12399@redhat.com> <4A52272A.2060101@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, davidel@xmailserver.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33627 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752724AbZGFQvV (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:51:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A52272A.2060101@novell.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 12:32:42PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > For the record, I would have rather just used my originally proposed > slow-work thread instead of all this ;) Or just keep the idle thread around, it's not a big deal. -- MST