From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] put qemu-kvm-x86.c into kvm.c
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:28:51 +0300
Message-ID: <20090708132851.GN28046@redhat.com>
References: <1247058542-31211-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1247058542-31211-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1247058542-31211-3-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1247058542-31211-4-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:59947 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753484AbZGHN2z (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:28:55 -0400
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n68DSsw8001253
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:28:54 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1247058542-31211-4-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:08:57AM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> big plan to start sharing code with upstream.
> 
It is hard enough (for me at least) to distinguish between upstream code
and qemu-kvm when I have to look at the code. Having them separated in
different files is very helpful. Looking at the filename in a grep result 
is enough to know if I should care about the result or not.

Can you simple include qemu-kvm-x86.c into kvm.c?

--
			Gleb.