From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:10:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de> References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa> <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <4A5747E4.3030101@us.ibm.com> <4A57586B.9050900@siemens.com> <4A576317.6010000@us.ibm.com> <4A577291.4000206@redhat.com> <4A57736D.6040708@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kevin Wolf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel , Christoph Hellwig To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:41871 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751323AbZGJRKi (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:10:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A57736D.6040708@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >If I'm not mistaken, the patch "qemu-io: Implement > >bdrv_get_buffer/bdrv_put_buffer" is missing from the queue. > > > > I just did a pull a few hours ago from Christoph's qemu-io tree. I'm > expecting qemu-io patches to go through his tree. I hold that patch back for now as it will need a bit of work if the ->bdrv_{get,put}_buffer renaming patch goes in. Just looking at the queue Anthony only has queued up the older non-renaming version. Anthony was this an accident or do you dislike the renaming?