From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Convert irq notifiers lists to RCU locking. Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:56:40 +0300 Message-ID: <20090713125640.GB10402@redhat.com> References: <1247400233-24243-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1247400233-24243-5-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39158 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755769AbZGMM50 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:57:26 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6DCvQAf001892 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:57:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1247400233-24243-5-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 03:03:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: > Use RCU locking for mask/ack notifiers lists. > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov > --- > virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c > index 5dde1ef..ba3a115 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c > @@ -179,18 +179,18 @@ void kvm_notify_acked_irq(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) > break; > } > } > - rcu_read_unlock(); > > - hlist_for_each_entry(kian, n, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list, link) > + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, n, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list, link) > if (kian->gsi == gsi) > kian->irq_acked(kian); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > } > > void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian) > { > mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock); > - hlist_add_head(&kian->link, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list); > + hlist_add_head_rcu(&kian->link, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list); > mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock); I think we need synchronize_rcu here as well. If the user adds a notifier, he expects to get notified of irqs immediately after the function returns, not after the next rcu grace period. > } > > @@ -198,8 +198,9 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian) > { > mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock); > - hlist_del_init(&kian->link); > + hlist_del_init_rcu(&kian->link); > mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock); > + synchronize_rcu(); > } > > int kvm_request_irq_source_id(struct kvm *kvm) > @@ -246,7 +247,7 @@ void kvm_register_irq_mask_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, > { > mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock); > kimn->irq = irq; > - hlist_add_head(&kimn->link, &kvm->mask_notifier_list); > + hlist_add_head_rcu(&kimn->link, &kvm->mask_notifier_list); > mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock); > } > > @@ -254,8 +255,9 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_mask_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, > struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier *kimn) > { > mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock); > - hlist_del(&kimn->link); > + hlist_del_rcu(&kimn->link); > mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock); > + synchronize_rcu(); > } > > void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool mask) > @@ -263,11 +265,11 @@ void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool mask) > struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier *kimn; > struct hlist_node *n; > > - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&kvm->irq_lock)); > - > - hlist_for_each_entry(kimn, n, &kvm->mask_notifier_list, link) > + rcu_read_lock(); > + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kimn, n, &kvm->mask_notifier_list, link) > if (kimn->irq == irq) > kimn->func(kimn, mask); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > } > > void kvm_free_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm) > -- > 1.6.2.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html