From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] more fine grained locking for IRQ injection
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:23:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090713132335.GB10387@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247476355-27284-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:12:30PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> kvm->irq_lock protects too much stuff, but still fail to protect
> everything it was design to protect (see ack notifiers call in pic). I
> want to make IRQ injection logic use more fine grained locking.
At least irq routing changes and notifier list changes
do not seem to be involved in irq injection.
So why do we want fine-grained locking there?
> This patch
> series split kvm->irq_lock mutex to smaller spinlocks each one protects
> only one thing. Irq routing, irq notifier lists and ioapic gain their own
> spinlock. pic is already uses its own lock. This patch series also makes
> interrupt injection to lapic lockless (several kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic()
> may run in parallel), but access to lapic was never fully locked in the
> first place. VCPU could access lapic in parallel with interrupt injection.
>
> The patch series is on top of my previous series that converts ack notifiers
> to the RCU locking.
>
> Gleb Natapov (5):
> Protect irq_sources_bitmap by kvm->lock instead of kvm->irq_lock
> Move irq routing to its own locking.
> Move irq notifiers lists to its own locking.
> Move IO APIC to its own lock.
> Drop kvm->irq_lock lock.
>
> arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 7 +-----
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 +-
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 2 -
> virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 35 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 7 ++---
> 10 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-13 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-13 9:12 [PATCH 0/5][RFC] more fine grained locking for IRQ injection Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] Protect irq_sources_bitmap by kvm->lock instead of kvm->irq_lock Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 14:29 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-13 14:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 14:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 15:01 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 15:03 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-13 15:11 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-13 15:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 9:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] Move irq routing to its own locking Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 9:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] Move irq notifiers lists " Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 11:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 14:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 14:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 14:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 15:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 15:32 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-13 15:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 16:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 16:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-13 16:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-13 16:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 16:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-13 9:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] Move IO APIC to its own lock Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 9:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] Drop kvm->irq_lock lock Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 13:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-07-13 13:28 ` [PATCH 0/5][RFC] more fine grained locking for IRQ injection Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 13:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 13:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 14:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 14:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-13 14:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-13 15:21 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090713132335.GB10387@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox