* Very high memory usage with KVM
@ 2009-07-25 17:43 Daniel Bareiro
2009-07-26 11:31 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-07-25 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM General
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1944 bytes --]
Hi all!
I have an installation with Ubuntu Hardy Heron server amd64 with KVM-62
from Ubuntu repositories installed on an HP Proliant DL380 G5 with two
Xeon E5405 quadcore processors and 16 GiB of RAM which has six VMs with
the following configuration of memory:
Hostname | RAM
===============+===============
Ganimedes | 2 GiB
Os | 1 GiB
Aprender | 2 GiB
Aps0 | 2 GiB
Aps2 | 4 GiB
Ratatoskr | 4 GiB
===============+===============
TOTAL | 15 GiB
Initially the host was created with a swap partition of 1 GiB (more 1
GiB than was free for use of host) but this amount with the time
remained short and I had to add a LV of 7 GiB to be used with swap,
being now a total of 8 GiB of swap of which at this moment I have only a
9% free. Is 'normal' this use of memory?
root@ss02:~# ps -e --sort -rss -Ho user,start_time,pid,pcpu,pmem,rss,size,vsz,args
USER START PID %CPU %MEM RSS SZ VSZ COMMAND
[...]
root Jul06 27471 52.3 24.4 4023232 4292200 4350296 kvm <ratatoskr>
root Jul24 9955 137 23.8 3923620 4308592 4350308 kvm <aps2>
root Jul06 8751 5.8 8.3 1368228 2171808 2229888 kvm <aps0>
root Jul07 8565 2.7 5.2 862844 2204704 2246416 kvm <aprender>
root Apr22 7842 0.6 3.6 600072 2172056 2230136 kvm <ganimedes>
root Jul01 7944 0.6 2.0 334860 1119916 1177996 kvm <os>
root@ss02:~# free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 16463388 16377844 85544 0 894216 66328
-/+ buffers/cache: 15417300 1046088
Swap: 8319948 7621916 698032
Updating to KVM-84 or superior can improve this situation?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-07-25 17:43 Very high memory usage with KVM Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-07-26 11:31 ` Avi Kivity 2009-07-26 14:56 ` Daniel Bareiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-26 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dbareiro, KVM General On 07/25/2009 08:43 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Hi all! > > I have an installation with Ubuntu Hardy Heron server amd64 with KVM-62 > from Ubuntu repositories installed on an HP Proliant DL380 G5 with two > Xeon E5405 quadcore processors and 16 GiB of RAM which has six VMs with > the following configuration of memory: > > Hostname | RAM > ===============+=============== > Ganimedes | 2 GiB > Os | 1 GiB > Aprender | 2 GiB > Aps0 | 2 GiB > Aps2 | 4 GiB > Ratatoskr | 4 GiB > ===============+=============== > TOTAL | 15 GiB > > > Initially the host was created with a swap partition of 1 GiB (more 1 > GiB than was free for use of host) but this amount with the time > remained short and I had to add a LV of 7 GiB to be used with swap, > being now a total of 8 GiB of swap of which at this moment I have only a > 9% free. Is 'normal' this use of memory? > > root@ss02:~# ps -e --sort -rss -Ho user,start_time,pid,pcpu,pmem,rss,size,vsz,args > USER START PID %CPU %MEM RSS SZ VSZ COMMAND > [...] > root Jul06 27471 52.3 24.4 4023232 4292200 4350296 kvm<ratatoskr> > root Jul24 9955 137 23.8 3923620 4308592 4350308 kvm<aps2> > root Jul06 8751 5.8 8.3 1368228 2171808 2229888 kvm<aps0> > root Jul07 8565 2.7 5.2 862844 2204704 2246416 kvm<aprender> > root Apr22 7842 0.6 3.6 600072 2172056 2230136 kvm<ganimedes> > root Jul01 7944 0.6 2.0 334860 1119916 1177996 kvm<os> > > root@ss02:~# free > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 16463388 16377844 85544 0 894216 66328 > -/+ buffers/cache: 15417300 1046088 > Swap: 8319948 7621916 698032 > > > Updating to KVM-84 or superior can improve this situation? > What is the storage configuration? Are you using qcow2? What are the image logical and physical sizes? What is the host kernel (uname -a)? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-07-26 11:31 ` Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-26 14:56 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-07-26 15:11 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-07-26 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KVM General [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9684 bytes --] Hi Avi. On Sunday, 26 July 2009 14:31:57 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >I have an installation with Ubuntu Hardy Heron server amd64 with KVM-62 > >from Ubuntu repositories installed on an HP Proliant DL380 G5 with two > >Xeon E5405 quadcore processors and 16 GiB of RAM which has six VMs with > >the following configuration of memory: > > > >Hostname | RAM > >===============+=============== > >Ganimedes | 2 GiB > >Os | 1 GiB > >Aprender | 2 GiB > >Aps0 | 2 GiB > >Aps2 | 4 GiB > >Ratatoskr | 4 GiB > >===============+=============== > >TOTAL | 15 GiB > > > > > >Initially the host was created with a swap partition of 1 GiB (more 1 > >GiB than was free for use of host) but this amount with the time > >remained short and I had to add a LV of 7 GiB to be used with swap, > >being now a total of 8 GiB of swap of which at this moment I have only a > >9% free. Is 'normal' this use of memory? > > > >root@ss02:~# ps -e --sort -rss -Ho user,start_time,pid,pcpu,pmem,rss,size,vsz,args > >USER START PID %CPU %MEM RSS SZ VSZ COMMAND > >[...] > >root Jul06 27471 52.3 24.4 4023232 4292200 4350296 kvm<ratatoskr> > >root Jul24 9955 137 23.8 3923620 4308592 4350308 kvm<aps2> > >root Jul06 8751 5.8 8.3 1368228 2171808 2229888 kvm<aps0> > >root Jul07 8565 2.7 5.2 862844 2204704 2246416 kvm<aprender> > >root Apr22 7842 0.6 3.6 600072 2172056 2230136 kvm<ganimedes> > >root Jul01 7944 0.6 2.0 334860 1119916 1177996 kvm<os> > > > >root@ss02:~# free > > total used free shared buffers cached > >Mem: 16463388 16377844 85544 0 894216 66328 > >-/+ buffers/cache: 15417300 1046088 > >Swap: 8319948 7621916 698032 > > > > > >Updating to KVM-84 or superior can improve this situation? > What is the storage configuration? Are you using qcow2? The host machine has 8 x 300 GiB SAS disk in RAID 5 by hardware (7 disks with 1 spare) on 1 logicaldrive. The partitioning scheme of host is the following one: root@ss02:~# fdisk -l /dev/cciss/c0d0 Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 1799.7 GB, 1799797127168 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 218812 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000af3c3 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 1 122 979933+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 * 123 1338 9767520 83 Linux /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 1339 218812 1746859905 8e Linux LVM I'm not using qcow2 files. The /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 partition is a physical volume that maintains the logical volumes that are used for VM's disks: root@ss02:~# pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 vm lvm2 a- 1,63T 1,13T > What are the image logical and physical sizes? The disks for the VMs have these sizes: aprender-raiz vm -wi-ao 8,00G aprender-space vm -wi-ao 20,00G aps0-raiz vm -wi-ao 7,00G aps0-space vm -wi-ao 10,00G aps2-cache vm -wi-ao 20,00G aps2-index vm -wi-ao 10,00G aps2-raiz vm -wi-ao 7,00G aps2-space vm -wi-ao 10,00G ganimedes-raiz vm -wi-ao 5,00G ganimedes-space vm -wi-ao 10,00G os-disk vm -wi-ao 6,00G os-mailbox vm -wi-ao 150,00G os-space vm -wi-ao 10,00G ratatoskr-raiz vm -wi-ao 8,00G ratatoskr-space vm -wi-ao 200,00G With respect to the internal partitioning scheme for each one of the VMs, it is the following one: * Aprender: aprender:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 8589 MB, 8589934592 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1044 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 486 3903763+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda2 487 1044 4482135 83 Linux aprender:~# aprender:~# aprender:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disk /dev/hdb: 21.4 GB, 21474836480 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 1 2610 20964793+ 83 Linux * Aps0: [root@aps:~] $fdisk -l /dev/hda Disco /dev/hda: 7516 MB, 7516192768 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 913 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00039c2a Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hda1 1 365 2931831 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda2 366 913 4401810 83 Linux [root@aps:~] $ [root@aps:~] $fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disco /dev/hdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00087cc1 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdb1 1 1305 10482381 83 Linux * Aps2 aps2:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda Disco /dev/hda: 7516 MB, 7516192768 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 913 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0004b793 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hda1 1 365 2931831 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda2 366 913 4401810 83 Linux aps2:~# aps2:~# aps2:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disco /dev/hdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0009491d Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdb1 1 1305 10482381 83 Linux aps2:~# aps2:~# aps2:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdc Disco /dev/hdc: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdc1 1 1305 10482381 83 Linux aps2:~# aps2:~# aps2:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdd Disco /dev/hdd: 21.4 GB, 21474836480 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdd1 1 2610 20964793+ 83 Linux * Ganimedes: [root@ganimedes:~] $fdisk -l /dev/hda Disco /dev/hda: 5368 MB, 5368709120 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 652 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0002cad1 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hda1 1 122 979933+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda2 123 652 4257225 83 Linux [root@ganimedes:~] $ [root@ganimedes:~] $fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disco /dev/hdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0007e07e Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdb1 1 1305 10482381 83 Linux * Os: os:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda Disco /dev/hda: 6442 MB, 6442450944 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 783 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000a78a9 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hda1 1 243 1951866 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda2 244 783 4337550 83 Linux os:~# os:~# os:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disco /dev/hdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000dffb2 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdb1 1 1305 10482381 83 Linux os:~# os:~# os:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdc Disco /dev/hdc: 161.0 GB, 161061273600 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19581 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x90c7dc67 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/hdc1 1 19581 157284351 83 Linux * Ratatosk: ratatoskr:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 8589 MB, 8589934592 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1044 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 486 3903763+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda2 487 1044 4482135 83 Linux ratatoskr:~# ratatoskr:~# ratatoskr:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disk /dev/hdb: 214.7 GB, 214748364800 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 26108 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 1 26108 209712478+ 83 Linux > What is the host kernel (uname -a)? root@ss02:~# uname -a Linux ss02 2.6.24-19-server #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 18:43:06 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thanks for your reply. Regards, Daniel -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598 [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-07-26 14:56 ` Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-07-26 15:11 ` Avi Kivity 2009-07-26 15:50 ` Daniel Bareiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-26 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dbareiro, KVM General On 07/26/2009 05:56 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > >> What is the storage configuration? Are you using qcow2? >> > > I'm not using qcow2 files. The /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 partition is a physical > volume that maintains the logical volumes that are used for VM's disks: > > In this case there should be no excessive memory usage. qcow2 could use extra memory, especially on older qemu-kvm versions (or images created with older qemu-img versions). >> What is the host kernel (uname -a)? >> > > root@ss02:~# uname -a > Linux ss02 2.6.24-19-server #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 18:43:06 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > kvm memory management with pre 2.6.27 host kernels is pretty weak. Using a newer host kernel (and newer kvm) may solve this problem. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-07-26 15:11 ` Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-26 15:50 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-07-26 16:19 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-07-26 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KVM General [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1750 bytes --] Avi On Sunday, 26 July 2009 18:11:27 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>What is the storage configuration? Are you using qcow2? > >I'm not using qcow2 files. The /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 partition is a > >physical volume that maintains the logical volumes that are used for > >VM's disks: > In this case there should be no excessive memory usage. qcow2 could > use extra memory, especially on older qemu-kvm versions (or images > created with older qemu-img versions). > >>What is the host kernel (uname -a)? > >root@ss02:~# uname -a > >Linux ss02 2.6.24-19-server #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 18:43:06 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux > kvm memory management with pre 2.6.27 host kernels is pretty weak. > Using a newer host kernel (and newer kvm) may solve this problem. Initially I am going to see how it improves the situation upgrading to KVM-84 of backports of Hardy Heron, since at the moment last kernel available for Hardy is the one I has commented. I would like to know if the newest versions of KVM published in the official site of the project solve a bug recently reported in Ubuntu Launchpad [1]. Also I was observing errors of type 'to swapper Not tainted' or 'java Not tainted' in the VM (aps2, with a high rate of I/O) and that I've commented in a previous message sent to the list [2]. I would want to know if you could indicate to me if this can be due to KVM bug that would be solved in a later version. Thanks for so quick reply. Regards, Daniel [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm/+bug/359447 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/37631 -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598 [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-07-26 15:50 ` Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-07-26 16:19 ` Avi Kivity 2009-08-08 0:54 ` Daniel Bareiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-26 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dbareiro, KVM General On 07/26/2009 06:50 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote: >> kvm memory management with pre 2.6.27 host kernels is pretty weak. >> Using a newer host kernel (and newer kvm) may solve this problem. >> > > Initially I am going to see how it improves the situation upgrading to > KVM-84 of backports of Hardy Heron, since at the moment last kernel > available for Hardy is the one I has commented. > > I would like to know if the newest versions of KVM published in the > official site of the project solve a bug recently reported in Ubuntu > Launchpad [1]. Also I was observing errors of type 'to swapper Not > tainted' or 'java Not tainted' in the VM (aps2, with a high rate of I/O) > and that I've commented in a previous message sent to the list [2]. I > would want to know if you could indicate to me if this can be due to KVM > bug that would be solved in a later version. > > My guess is that it is due to poor swapping with pre-2.6.27 hosts. 15 GB used out of 16GB total is just 6% reserve, which may be a bit too low. With a 2.6.27 host some small amount of memory would be swapped out, before that you'd see thrashing. Another way to check is to drop one guest (or reduce total memory needed by 1GB) and see if you get the same results or if things improve. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-07-26 16:19 ` Avi Kivity @ 2009-08-08 0:54 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-08-09 9:12 ` Avi Kivity 2009-08-10 6:40 ` Bernhard Held 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-08-08 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KVM General [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6203 bytes --] Hi Avi. On Sunday, 26 July 2009 19:19:39 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>kvm memory management with pre 2.6.27 host kernels is pretty weak. > >>Using a newer host kernel (and newer kvm) may solve this problem. > > > >Initially I am going to see how it improves the situation upgrading > >to KVM-84 of backports of Hardy Heron, since at the moment last > >kernel available for Hardy is the one I has commented. > > > >I would like to know if the newest versions of KVM published in the > >official site of the project solve a bug recently reported in Ubuntu > >Launchpad [1]. Also I was observing errors of type 'to swapper Not > >tainted' or 'java Not tainted' in the VM (aps2, with a high rate of > >I/O) and that I've commented in a previous message sent to the list > >[2]. I would want to know if you could indicate to me if this can be > >due to KVM bug that would be solved in a later version. > My guess is that it is due to poor swapping with pre-2.6.27 hosts. > 15 GB used out of 16GB total is just 6% reserve, which may be a bit > too low. With a 2.6.27 host some small amount of memory would be > swapped out, before that you'd see thrashing. Another way to check > is to drop one guest (or reduce total memory needed by 1GB) and see > if you get the same results or if things improve. I was testing in another equipment of similar characteristics with 4 VMs of 3.5 GiB of RAM on LVM and rather less the 16 GB of RAM in use in the host machine and 4 GIB available of the 8 GIB of swap, and after to update to KVM-88 the use of virtual memory improved enough. At the moment these are the statistics of memory usage: root@ss03:~# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 16463396 6700900 9762496 0 2805756 391884 -/+ buffers/cache: 3503260 12960136 Swap: 8319948 0 8319948 Still I didn't update the kernel, so I am using KVM-88 with kernel 2.6.24-19. I would like to know if this can have some disadvantage, since in the official site of the project I was reading that kernel has to be 2.6.25 or newer to run the kvm 76 userspace (or any newer release). The reason by which I didn't update kernel is because I was with some problems with the network interface on the host machine. Perhaps this problem is off-topic, but if somebody can help me with this, then it would contribute whereupon it can improve the KVM performance. I've downloaded to the source code of 2.6.30.3 and I compiled it with: # fakeroot make-kpkg clean # fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-dgb kernel_image kernel_headers Although the compilation finishes without problems, I am having a problem booting the operating system. The interfaces fail to load. This equipment is a Proliant DL380 G5 with two NetXtreme II BCM5708 Ethernet Gigabit interfaces. With kernel of the Ubuntu Hardy repositories I did not have any kind of problem, but with kernel compiled by myself I obtain the following error message during the boot that it suggests cannot accede to firmware of this network interface: Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.750023] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751070] bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw" Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751141] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A disabled Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751167] bnx2: probe of 0000:03:00.0 failed with error -2 Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751244] bnx2 0000:05:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 The peculiar thing is that if I do: # rmmod bnx2 # modprobe bnx2 Yes it loads the interfaces. I read something of this in a bug report of Debian GNU/Linux [1] and tried with the suggestion to do: # update-initramfs -u The files seem to be: # find / | grep bnx /boot/lib/modules/2.6.30.3-dgb/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2 /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/0000:03:00.0 /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/0000:05:00.0 /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/module /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/uevent /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/unbind /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/bind /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/new_id /sys/bus/pci/drivers/bnx2/remove_id /sys/module/bnx2 /sys/module/bnx2/holders /sys/module/bnx2/version /sys/module/bnx2/srcversion /sys/module/bnx2/initstate /sys/module/bnx2/refcnt /sys/module/bnx2/sections /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.note.gnu.build-id /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.text /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.exit.text /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.devinit.text /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.init.text /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.devexit.text /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.rodata /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.rodata.str1.1 /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.smp_locks /sys/module/bnx2/sections/__bug_table /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.rodata.str1.8 /sys/module/bnx2/sections/__param /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.devinit.rodata /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.data /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.devinit.data /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.gnu.linkonce.this_module /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.bss /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.symtab /sys/module/bnx2/sections/.strtab /sys/module/bnx2/notes /sys/module/bnx2/notes/.note.gnu.build-id /sys/module/bnx2/drivers /sys/module/bnx2/drivers/pci:bnx2 /lib/firmware/bnx2 /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-4.6.16.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-4.6.15.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-4.6.17.fw /lib/modules/2.6.30.4-dgb/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko /lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko But after boot I have again the same problem. /etc/initramfs-tools/modules doesn't make reference to some module. I do not see that in Ubuntu Hardy firmware-bnx2 is a package, although am not sure either if it is necessary with kernel compiled from the sources. With 2.6.30.4 it happens the same exactly. Thanks for your reply. Regards, Daniel [1] http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Downloads -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598 [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-08-08 0:54 ` Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-08-09 9:12 ` Avi Kivity 2009-08-10 6:40 ` Bernhard Held 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-08-09 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dbareiro, KVM General On 08/08/2009 03:54 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote: >> My guess is that it is due to poor swapping with pre-2.6.27 hosts. >> 15 GB used out of 16GB total is just 6% reserve, which may be a bit >> too low. With a 2.6.27 host some small amount of memory would be >> swapped out, before that you'd see thrashing. Another way to check >> is to drop one guest (or reduce total memory needed by 1GB) and see >> if you get the same results or if things improve. >> > > I was testing in another equipment of similar characteristics with 4 VMs of > 3.5 GiB of RAM on LVM and rather less the 16 GB of RAM in use in the host > machine and 4 GIB available of the 8 GIB of swap, and after to update to > KVM-88 the use of virtual memory improved enough. > > At the moment these are the statistics of memory usage: > > root@ss03:~# free > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 16463396 6700900 9762496 0 2805756 391884 > -/+ buffers/cache: 3503260 12960136 > Swap: 8319948 0 8319948 > > > Still I didn't update the kernel, so I am using KVM-88 with kernel > 2.6.24-19. I would like to know if this can have some disadvantage, since > in the official site of the project I was reading that kernel has to be > 2.6.25 or newer to run the kvm 76 userspace (or any newer release). > I think it's just luck; with kernel < 2.6.27 swapping behaviour will not be very good. > The reason by which I didn't update kernel is because I was with some > problems with the network interface on the host machine. Perhaps this > problem is off-topic, but if somebody can help me with this, then it would > contribute whereupon it can improve the KVM performance. > > Please take it to netdev, perhaps they can help you with this. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-08-08 0:54 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-08-09 9:12 ` Avi Kivity @ 2009-08-10 6:40 ` Bernhard Held 2009-08-10 15:22 ` Daniel Bareiro 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Bernhard Held @ 2009-08-10 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kvm Hi Daniel! > Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.750023] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw > Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751070] bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw" > Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751141] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A disabled > Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751167] bnx2: probe of 0000:03:00.0 failed with error -2 > Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751244] bnx2 0000:05:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Is bnx2.ko loaded by initramfs? Then the initramfs must contain the requested firmware file. Another possibility is to set FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL in the kernel config. Bernhard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-08-10 6:40 ` Bernhard Held @ 2009-08-10 15:22 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-08-10 16:15 ` Bernhard Held 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-08-10 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kvm [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1546 bytes --] On Monday, 10 August 2009 08:40:48 +0200, Bernhard Held wrote: > Hi Daniel! Hi Bernhard! > >Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.750023] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw > >Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751070] bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw" > >Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751141] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A disabled > >Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751167] bnx2: probe of 0000:03:00.0 failed with error -2 > >Aug 4 17:38:39 ss03 kernel: [ 4.751244] bnx2 0000:05:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 > Is bnx2.ko loaded by initramfs? Then the initramfs must contain the > requested firmware file. > > Another possibility is to set FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL in the kernel config. I've set in the kernel config: CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y Although I don't see the asked file in initramfs. The file with full path is /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw: # zcat /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30.4-dgb | cpio -t | grep bnx2 lib/modules/2.6.30.4-dgb/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko 300859 blocks Whereupon this variable is set to 'y' would not have to be sufficient? <just_guessing> 1) Perhaps firmware must be in some other directory. 2) Perhaps there is no access to the FS in /lib at the moment that loads drivers. </just_guessing> Thanks for your reply. Regards, Daniel -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598 [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-08-10 15:22 ` Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-08-10 16:15 ` Bernhard Held 2009-08-22 2:28 ` Daniel Bareiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Bernhard Held @ 2009-08-10 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dbareiro, kvm Hi Daniel! > I've set in the kernel config: > > CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y And what happened? Are you sure you recompiled and booted the new kernel with CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y? > Although I don't see the asked file in initramfs. The file with full > path is /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw: > > # zcat /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30.4-dgb | cpio -t | grep bnx2 > lib/modules/2.6.30.4-dgb/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko > 300859 blocks > > Whereupon this variable is set to 'y' would not have to be sufficient? > > <just_guessing> > 1) Perhaps firmware must be in some other directory. > 2) Perhaps there is no access to the FS in /lib at the moment that loads > drivers. > </just_guessing> Obviously bnx2.ko is loaded from initramfs. At that time the root filesystem is not accessible. I expected CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y is sufficient to solve the problem. Here is what I would try: - make sure the firmware is included in your kernel, or - keep bnx2.ko from including in initramfs (unless you boot via network), or - include /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw in initramfs HTH Bernhard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Very high memory usage with KVM 2009-08-10 16:15 ` Bernhard Held @ 2009-08-22 2:28 ` Daniel Bareiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Bareiro @ 2009-08-22 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kvm [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2338 bytes --] On Monday, 10 August 2009 18:15:17 +0200, Bernhard Held wrote: > Hi Daniel! Hi, Bernhard! > > I've set in the kernel config: > > > > CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y > And what happened? Are you sure you recompiled and booted the new > kernel with CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y? > > [...] > > Here is what I would try: > - make sure the firmware is included in your kernel, or > - keep bnx2.ko from including in initramfs (unless you boot via network), or > - include /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw in initramfs According to the tests that I was doing, the CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y option is not sufficient. Also it is necessary to use CONFIG_BNX2=y. According to which I was reading, with the CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y option, the driver is including in kernel as long as driver it is compiled in kernel and not in modular form. In order to obtain this it is necessary to use the CONFIG_BNX2=y option. This option is established following the path Device Drivers -> Network device support -> Ethernet (1000 Mbit) of the ncurses menu. Then, we marked with asterisk Broadcom NetXtremeII support here. With this, the interfaces were configured during bootstrapping without problems: [ 2.805440] Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.0.1 (May 6, 2009) [ 2.805458] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 [ 3.410016] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: firmware: using built-in firmware bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw [ 3.410019] bnx2 0000:03:00.0: firmware: using built-in firmware bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-4.6.16.fw [ 3.410139] eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem f8000000, IRQ 16, node addr 00:21:5a:d5:dc:42 [ 3.410190] bnx2 0000:05:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 [ 4.020012] bnx2 0000:05:00.0: firmware: using built-in firmware bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-4.6.16.fw [ 4.020014] bnx2 0000:05:00.0: firmware: using built-in firmware bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-4.6.16.fw [ 4.020113] eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem fa000000, IRQ 17, node addr 00:21:5a:d5:dc:40 Thanks for your reply. Regards, Daniel -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598 [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-22 2:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-07-25 17:43 Very high memory usage with KVM Daniel Bareiro 2009-07-26 11:31 ` Avi Kivity 2009-07-26 14:56 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-07-26 15:11 ` Avi Kivity 2009-07-26 15:50 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-07-26 16:19 ` Avi Kivity 2009-08-08 0:54 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-08-09 9:12 ` Avi Kivity 2009-08-10 6:40 ` Bernhard Held 2009-08-10 15:22 ` Daniel Bareiro 2009-08-10 16:15 ` Bernhard Held 2009-08-22 2:28 ` Daniel Bareiro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).