From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:48:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20090729134857.GL18313@amd.com> References: <1248872192-30881-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4A70492E.2080705@redhat.com> <20090729130944.GE18313@amd.com> <4A704F5B.9000800@redhat.com> <20090729133840.GG18313@amd.com> <4A705327.8050101@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A705327.8050101@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:48:23PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/29/2009 04:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >>In that case, the next interesting target is nested npt. This may > >>actually make nsvm perform well. Any plans? > > > >Yes. Plan is to implement this when I am through with the cleanups. > > Great, this promises to be the most interesting area of development > in kvm for those of us who don't read ppc. Performance isn't too bad even without this. At least if the host supports nested paging :) But shadow nested paging should give nested svm a real boost, thats very true. Joerg