From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Bareiro Subject: Bandwith limitation with KVM VMs Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:32:05 -0300 Message-ID: <20090803163205.GJ23503@defiant.freesoftware.org> Reply-To: dbareiro@gmx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F4+N/OgRSdC8YnqX" To: KVM General Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:60551 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932288AbZHCQcK (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:32:10 -0400 Received: from defiant (defiant.freesoftware.org [10.1.0.65]) by hermes.freesoftware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5534639 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:32:02 -0300 (ART) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --F4+N/OgRSdC8YnqX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all! I have a KVM VM that it has installed a MRTG on the network interface and that it doesn't register more than 10 Mbps, seeming that per moments it is saturated in this value. Has KVM some bandwidth limitation of the virtualized network interfaces? In such case, exists some way to increase that limitation? Thanks in advance. Regards, Daniel --=20 Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598 --F4+N/OgRSdC8YnqX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkp3EQUACgkQZpa/GxTmHTebmQCfXuUcRbagAhH+nxA+IhnDZafU lUgAnA5tfI+4yCVJV3bhseTIbZ4x9Ekl =094I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F4+N/OgRSdC8YnqX--