From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:10:48 +0300
Message-ID: <20090819131048.GD3080@redhat.com>
References: <20090813182749.GA6585@redhat.com> <4A8BB4EF.7030403@Voltaire.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@voltaire.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:36223 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752108AbZHSNMK (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:12:10 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A8BB4EF.7030403@Voltaire.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:16:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > The patches are against 2.6.31-rc4.  I'd like them to go into linux-next
> > and down the road 2.6.32 if possible.  Please comment.
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Just wanted to make sure with you how this can be tested, is 2.6.31-rc4 
> plus these two patches enough to form the kernel part? I wasn't sure if
> both the irqfd/iosignalfd are needed and if both are merged to Linus tree...

No, these patches are on top of Avi's kvm.git

> As for the user space part, should I use upstream qemu plus patches 1-4?

qemu-kvm

> Or.