From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] qemu-kvm: vhost net support Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:49:30 +0300 Message-ID: <20090820174930.GA9210@redhat.com> References: <20090810192304.GA16781@redhat.com> <4A808840.70704@codemonkey.ws> <20090812173548.GA29981@redhat.com> <200908201649.48082.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090820170028.GA8908@redhat.com> <4A8D86D5.4090809@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Rusty Russell , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Anthony Liguori , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48294 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753292AbZHTRvE (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:51:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A8D86D5.4090809@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:24:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/20/2009 08:00 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> Surprisingly, I seem to get better-than-userspace throughput with this >> benchmark as well. Here's a test run locally, host-to-guest, >> over a veth link: Bleh, I knew it's too good to be true. botched the setup. Pls disregard this, will post real numbers soon. Sorry about the noise, -- MST