From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: vhost net: performance with ping benchmark Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:45:55 +0300 Message-ID: <20090825134555.GD13949@redhat.com> References: <20090824081240.GA3415@redhat.com> <20090824212137.GA9835@redhat.com> <4A934AF7.2090904@codemonkey.ws> <4A936525.5030300@redhat.com> <20090825064604.GB10429@redhat.com> <4A93E235.5040008@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , Mark McLoughlin To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57482 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754145AbZHYNro (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:47:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A93E235.5040008@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:08:05AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Once it goes into the upstream > kernel, we need to have backwards compatibility code in QEMU forever to > support that kernel version. BTW, qemu can keep doing the userspace thing if some capability it needs is missing. It won't be worse off than if the driver is not upstream at all :). -- MST