From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: vhost net: performance with ping benchmark Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:14:26 +0300 Message-ID: <20090826081425.GA17414@redhat.com> References: <20090824081240.GA3415@redhat.com> <4A936525.5030300@redhat.com> <200908251434.41402.arnd@arndb.de> <200908261704.45298.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin To: Rusty Russell Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65356 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750867AbZHZIQI (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:16:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908261704.45298.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 05:04:44PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:04:41 pm Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 08/25/2009 05:22 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > > > > I think 2.6.32 is pushing it. > > > > > > 2.6.32 is pushing it, but we need to push it. > > > > Agreed. > > Get real. It's not happening. > > We need migration completely solved and tested. I want to see all the > features supported, including indirect descs and GSO. I'm not sure why indirect descs are needed for virtio-net. Comments? > If this wasn't a new userspace ABI, I'd be all for throwing it in as > experimental ASAP. > > Rusty.