From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: vhost net: performance with ping benchmark Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:04:44 +0930 Message-ID: <200908261704.45298.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20090824081240.GA3415@redhat.com> <4A936525.5030300@redhat.com> <200908251434.41402.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:50332 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757199AbZHZHer (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:34:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200908251434.41402.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:04:41 pm Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 08/25/2009 05:22 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > > I think 2.6.32 is pushing it. > > > > 2.6.32 is pushing it, but we need to push it. > > Agreed. Get real. It's not happening. We need migration completely solved and tested. I want to see all the features supported, including indirect descs and GSO. If this wasn't a new userspace ABI, I'd be all for throwing it in as experimental ASAP. Rusty.