From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Another set of Nested SVM fixes and cleanups
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:18:58 +0200
Message-ID: <20090916141858.GH8480@amd.com>
References: <1253107459-8967-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
 <4AB0F013.8050608@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from va3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.15]:14689
	"EHLO VA3EHSOBE006.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751418AbZIPOT0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:19:26 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AB0F013.8050608@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:02:59PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/16/2009 04:24 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this series of patches contain another set of cleanups and an important fix to
> >the Nested SVM code. These patches make the TSC handling code for SVM aware of
> >a nested guest. This fixes the TSC running backwards on guest and nested guest.
> >The backwards running TSC resulted in stalled guests when kvm-clock was
> >enabled. Please consider to apply.
> >
> 
> Looks good.  3, 4 needed for 2.6.32-rc as well, yes?

Yes, would be good since these two are real bugfixes. Probably also
relevant for -stable.

	Joerg