From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: Release plan for 0.12.0 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:20:09 +0530 Message-ID: <20090930145009.GA13566@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <20090930051703.GE28188@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AC35751.2090206@us.ibm.com> <20090930133715.GA8503@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AC36F7A.7030001@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel , Paul Brook , Rusty Russell To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25601 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754562AbZI3OvL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:51:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AC36F7A.7030001@us.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (Wed) Sep 30 2009 [09:47:22], Anthony Liguori wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: >> On (Wed) Sep 30 2009 [08:04:17], Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> Amit Shah wrote: >>> >>>> On (Tue) Sep 29 2009 [18:54:53], Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> o multiport virtio-console support >>>> >>> Assuming we can get the kernel drivers straightened out, I think it's >>> certainly reasonable for 0.12. >> >> The kernel drivers are in fine shape. > > I meant on track for including into the appropriate tree. Looking for > an Ack/Nack from Rusty. That's been the general policy for all virtio > changes btw. Nothing specific to virtio-console. That's fine. Amit