From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: migrate_set_downtime bug
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:33:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006173325.GG8092@mothafucka.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90D306BE6EBC8D428A824FBBA7A3113D010EFFE8F5@ronja.maurer-it.com>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:30:14AM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > > 'bandwidth' is something that changes dynamically (or by user
> > settings), so why don't we simply abort after some amount of
> > transferred memory (constant * memory size). This can be implemented by
> > the management application without problems, although it's much easier
> > inside kvm.
> > >
> > Easier, yes.
> >
> > But then once it is done, people wanting a different behaviour for some
> > valid reason are stuck with that.
> > This is the very reason we expose information about migration in the
> > monitor to begin with.
>
> No problem. Maybe you can just commit the first part of my patch then?
Anthony should do it.
Given the circumnstances: your method and the current method are both approximations.
Your works where current fails, and none of us can come up with a better solution,
I ack it.
>
> > Again, I believe the fix for this convergence problem does not belong
> > here.
>
> The default downtime is set to 30ms. This value triggers the convergence problem quite often. Maybe a longer default is more reasonable.
What do you feel about 100 ms?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 13:00 migrate_set_downtime bug Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-29 14:36 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-29 15:09 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-29 15:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-29 16:23 ` Glauber Costa
2009-09-29 16:36 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-30 4:48 ` Glauber Costa
2009-09-30 6:58 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-30 8:55 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-30 11:23 ` Glauber Costa
2009-09-30 14:11 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-09-30 16:39 ` Glauber Costa
2009-09-30 18:41 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-05 12:17 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-05 13:04 ` Glauber Costa
2009-10-05 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-05 14:09 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-05 15:32 ` Glauber Costa
2009-10-06 8:30 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-06 17:33 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2009-10-07 4:42 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-07 12:32 ` Glauber Costa
2009-10-07 19:40 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-05 14:01 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-05 14:06 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-05 14:08 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-05 14:15 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-05 14:11 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-10-05 14:18 ` Dietmar Maurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091006173325.GG8092@mothafucka.localdomain \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).