From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Plesner Jacobsen Subject: Re: net packet storms with multiple NICs Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:33:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20091023163339.GN2455@nerd.dk> References: <4AE1D903.5030709@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , KVM list To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: Received: from irq.hestdesign.com ([212.97.207.97]:43524 "EHLO irq.hestdesign.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494AbZJWQkx (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:40:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AE1D903.5030709@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:25:39PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > o why different -net guest -net host pairs are not getting different > vlan= indexes by default, to stop the above-mentioned packet > storms right away? I think it's a wise default to assign different > pairs to different vlans, by counting -net host and -net guest > sequences. I think the major issue is that the definition of a "pair" is when the vlan-options match. There's no requirement to define the two after each other. -- Andreas