From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Fix kdump under KVM. Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:21:31 -0200 Message-ID: <20091030222131.GB3288@amt.cnet> References: <1256661667-9298-1-git-send-email-clalance@redhat.com> <1256661667-9298-6-git-send-email-clalance@redhat.com> <20091027174246.GA10473@amt.cnet> <4AE81B36.5010104@redhat.com> <20091028124100.GA3063@amt.cnet> <4AEADADD.7070501@redhat.com> <20091030130712.GA2778@amt.cnet> <4AEB0601.10103@redhat.com> <4AEB2A68.70602@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Lalancette , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity To: "David S. Ahern" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5292 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932844AbZJ3XDR (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:03:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AEB2A68.70602@cisco.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:03:20PM -0600, David S. Ahern wrote: > > On 10/30/2009 09:28 AM, Chris Lalancette wrote: > >> > >> For VMX, the guests TSC's are now usually synchronized (which was not > >> the case before, when this patch was written). For AMD, they start out > >> of sync. > >> > >> Migration also causes them to be out of sync. So i'd prefer to postpone > >> the removal of this limitation until there is a guarantee the TSCs > >> are synchronized across vcpus. > > > > OK. I'll try to get on an unsynchronized TSC machine and see if I can reproduce > > there. > > Perhaps Marcelo was referring to his patchset from December 2008 > targeting TSC synchronization? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg08071.html > > David Yes, unsynchronized TSCs in the guest perspective.