From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net>
Subject: Doubt on KVM-88 vulnerabilities
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:42:40 -0300
Message-ID: <20091108184240.GA29279@defiant.freesoftware>
Reply-To: dbareiro@gmx.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE"
To: KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46364 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1754807AbZKHSmn (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:42:43 -0500
Received: from defiant (defiant.freesoftware [10.1.0.65])
	by hermes.freesoftware (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE00E9C6
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Sun,  8 Nov 2009 15:41:52 -0300 (ART)
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>


--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi all!

I'm using KVM-88 compiled by myself from the source code provided by the
official site of the project.

Is this version of KVM vulnerable to the mentioned thing in the
DSA-1907-1 [1]? In such case, there is some published patch that can be
applied or some new version that solves this?

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Regards,
Daniel

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2009/msg00229.html
--=20
Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9  29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze - Linux user #188.598

--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkr3ESAACgkQZpa/GxTmHTfEogCfXTtt/ZxTwhgwTIrme1/wzoAV
3bEAn3IR7VbEJl5LSq3h1c4+R1rr5/SV
=0Bvs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--