From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Treutner <thomas@scripty.at>
Subject: Re: Virtualization Performance: Intel vs. AMD
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:23:01 +0100
Message-ID: <200911171123.01923.thomas@scripty.at>
References: <loom.20091115T131403-834@post.gmane.org> <200911151655.07947.thomas@scripty.at> <4B012583.9060706@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from static.115.55.40.188.clients.your-server.de ([188.40.55.115]:56562
	"EHLO scripty.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753150AbZKQKXH (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:23:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4B012583.9060706@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Monday 16 November 2009 11:12:19 Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Anyways, I'm just curious, as this feature is
> > primarily interesting for development, IMHO.
>
> No, it's primarily interesting for performance.

I think I confused NPT with support for nested virtualization (which I think 
no one except devs would have a use case for). Thanks for the pointer.


-t