From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Breakage due to commit c1699988 ("v3: don't call reset
	functions on cpu initialization")
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:00:59 -0200
Message-ID: <20091123190059.GD11530@mothafucka.localdomain>
References: <4B094DC4.1000107@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63005 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751781AbZKWTAz (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:00:55 -0500
Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nANJ11KB014572
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:01:01 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B094DC4.1000107@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:42:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> A qemu-kvm which merges this commit breaks badly (see qemu-kvm.git next  
> branch).  In the commit log for this commit, you write
>
>     I tested it with qemu (with and without io-thread) and qemu-kvm, and it
>     seems to be doing okay - although qemu-kvm uses a slightly different 
> patch.
>
> Can you share the slightly different patch (against 'next') please?
Sorry, I don't follow. You said you tested it and it works, so what exactly
do we need from me here?