From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm initialize vcpu state after machine initialization Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:51:37 -0200 Message-ID: <20091215125137.GA10077@amt.cnet> References: <20091209174654.GA28056@amt.cnet> <4B20C058.5080307@redhat.com> <4B20C32B.7070005@redhat.com> <20091214203637.GA7120@amt.cnet> <20091215112037.GC8031@redhat.com> <20091215122415.GA9715@amt.cnet> <4B278194.7000209@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gleb Natapov , Glauber de Oliveira Costa , kvm To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63758 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494AbZLOMvp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:51:45 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBFCpjYJ003059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:51:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B278194.7000209@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/15/2009 02:24 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >>> >>> This patch essentially revers commit 898c51c3. This commit fixes two >>> races. First race is like this: >>> >>> vcpu0 vcpu1 >>> >>> starts running >>> loads lapic state into kernel >>> sends event to vcpu1 >>> starts running >>> loads lapic state into kernel >>> overwrites event from vcpu0 >>> >>> At the time 898c51c3 was committed the race was easily reproducible >>> by starting VM with 16 cpus + seabios. Sometimes some vcpus lost INIT/SIPI >>> events. Now I am not able to reproduce it even with this patch applied, >>> so something else changed, but it doesn't make the race non existent or >>> acceptable. >>> >> Note qemu_kvm_load_lapic depends on env->created set (kvm_vcpu_inited), >> so having init_vcpu+load_regs before signalling vcpu creation did not >> fix this one (but yeah, thanks for the reminder on the races). >> > > So safest to revert and wait for a fixed patch? Yeah, sorry.