From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: Qemu vs Qemu-KVM Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:22:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20091221072252.GR4490@redhat.com> References: <20091220231024.GK12659@x40.openbsd.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Mikolaj Kucharski , kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48366 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbZLUHXA (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:23:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091220231024.GK12659@x40.openbsd.home.lan> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:10:24PM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > Hi all, > > Qemu and Qemu-KVM, are they the same projects with the same developers > behind of those projects or not? Are those projects trying to converge > at some stage, or is this just RedHat's convention to create from kvm's > sources package named qemu? > Trying to converge. > I have an issue with qemu from Fedora 12, and I've send email[#ref1] to > qemu-devel mailing list, but after looking again closer to 0.12.1 > release from qemu.org and kvm.sf.net sources are not the same. > > I have personal interest in resolving RedHat's bz #508801, unfortunately > I cannot do that myself, so I wanted to ask on the list for help, but now > I'm confused where should I go. > Can you try kvm modules from latest kvm.git please? It looks like emulation of "push %ds" fails and it was added after 2.6.32. -- Gleb.