From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: Qemu vs Qemu-KVM Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:15:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20091222071557.GX4490@redhat.com> References: <20091220231024.GK12659@x40.openbsd.home.lan> <20091221072252.GR4490@redhat.com> <20091221222114.GM12659@x40.openbsd.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Mikolaj Kucharski , kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11202 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750919AbZLVHQD (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:16:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091221222114.GM12659@x40.openbsd.home.lan> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:21:14PM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:22:52AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > I have personal interest in resolving RedHat's bz #508801, unfortunately > > > I cannot do that myself, so I wanted to ask on the list for help, but now > > > I'm confused where should I go. > > > > > Can you try kvm modules from latest kvm.git please? It looks like emulation of > > "push %ds" fails and it was added after 2.6.32. > > Having following GIT repositories: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-kmod.git > > Which one I should use to build my modules from? I would like to keep my > system (Fedora 12) consistent and I don't want to have any parts built > outside of rpm. I would like to contribute/help for RedHat's bz #508801 > resolution, but I need some directions. > > Is kvm.git whole Linux kernel? > Don't bother, I already tested upstream with OpenBSD and, as Avi said, the problem is somewhere else. -- Gleb.