From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: CPU hotplug add seems broken
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:03:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20100111110328.GJ7549@redhat.com>
References: <5e93dcec1001100033tdb930eqcaf48a36ee36b335@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100110084353.GI4905@redhat.com>
 <5e93dcec1001110124l38d35ef7y4e92aa8b74aa810a@mail.gmail.com>
 <4B4AFC09.3090909@redhat.com>
 <20100111102434.GG7549@redhat.com>
 <4B4AFCB0.1080706@redhat.com>
 <20100111104213.GH7549@redhat.com>
 <4B4B025D.1020309@redhat.com>
 <20100111105331.GI7549@redhat.com>
 <4B4B0450.9010904@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki.ryota@gmail.com>, dbareiro@gmx.net,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35691 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751180Ab0AKLDd (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2010 06:03:33 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B4B0450.9010904@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:58:24PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/11/2010 12:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >
> >>>Anyway all those solution do not
> >>>guaranty that we will be able to do cpu hotplug on Windows since we
> >>>don't yet know what Windows expects.
> >>I'm sure we'll be able to eventually.
> >>
> >Eventually yes, but can you say now that it will not require DSDT changes or
> >command line parameter?
> 
> No, but I'm not really worried about that.
> 
So you want to introduce something that we know upset Windows without
looking into alternatives. And as far as I remember upstream position
on the UNISYS way was negative, did this change?

--
			Gleb.