From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
cotte@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCHv2] kvm-s390: fix potential array overrun in intercept handling
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:19:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001211219.07628.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5833C3.8070908@redhat.com>
v2: apply Avis suggestions about ARRAY_SIZE.
kvm_handle_sie_intercept uses a jump table to get the intercept handler
for a SIE intercept. Static code analysis revealed a potential problem:
the intercept_funcs jump table was defined to contain (0x48 >> 2) entries,
but we only checked for code > 0x48 which would cause an off-by-one
array overflow if code == 0x48.
Use the compiler and ARRAY_SIZE to automatically set the limits.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
(patch was refreshed with -U8 to see the full jump table.)
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -208,32 +208,32 @@ static int handle_instruction_and_prog(s
if (rc == -ENOTSUPP)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode = 0x04;
if (rc)
return rc;
return rc2;
}
-static const intercept_handler_t intercept_funcs[0x48 >> 2] = {
+static const intercept_handler_t intercept_funcs[] = {
[0x00 >> 2] = handle_noop,
[0x04 >> 2] = handle_instruction,
[0x08 >> 2] = handle_prog,
[0x0C >> 2] = handle_instruction_and_prog,
[0x10 >> 2] = handle_noop,
[0x14 >> 2] = handle_noop,
[0x1C >> 2] = kvm_s390_handle_wait,
[0x20 >> 2] = handle_validity,
[0x28 >> 2] = handle_stop,
};
int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
intercept_handler_t func;
u8 code = vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode;
- if (code & 3 || code > 0x48)
+ if (code & 3 || (code >> 2) >= ARRAY_SIZE(intercept_funcs))
return -ENOTSUPP;
func = intercept_funcs[code >> 2];
if (func)
return func(vcpu);
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 10:56 [PATCH] kvm-s390: fix potential array overrun in intercept handling Christian Borntraeger
2010-01-21 11:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-21 11:19 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2010-01-21 11:24 ` [PATCHv2] " Heiko Carstens
2010-01-21 11:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-01-21 17:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-21 23:15 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001211219.07628.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox