From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] KVM: Activate fpu on clts Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:56:06 -0200 Message-ID: <20100123185606.GC24943@amt.cnet> References: <1264080712-3981-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <1264080712-3981-4-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11039 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752021Ab0AWTgR (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:36:17 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0NJaG7S020959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:36:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1264080712-3981-4-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 03:31:47PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Assume that if the guest executes clts, it knows what it's doing, and load the > guest fpu to prevent an #NM exception. > > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity > --- Out of curiosity, previously you assumed lazy activation on clts was a win. Why undo it?