From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: mark segments accessed on HW task switch Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:11:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20100125111109.GA8483@redhat.com> References: <20100125100104.GA4609@redhat.com> <4B5D7B9D.7080401@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5562 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753812Ab0AYLLL (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:11:11 -0500 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0PBBBxR020395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:11:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5D7B9D.7080401@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:08:13PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/25/2010 12:01 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >On HW task switch newly loaded segments should me marked as accessed. > > > >@@ -4775,6 +4766,11 @@ int kvm_load_segment_descriptor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 selector, > > kvm_seg.unusable = 1; > > > > kvm_set_segment(vcpu,&kvm_seg, seg); > >+ if (selector&& !kvm_seg.unusable&& kvm_seg.s) { > >+ /* mark segment as accessed */ > >+ seg_desc.type |= 1; > >+ save_guest_segment_descriptor(vcpu, selector,&seg_desc); > >+ } > > return 0; > > } > > What about an error return from s_g_s_d? > What can or should we do about it? -- Gleb.