Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26

Anthony Liguori
2010-01-26T14:13:11Z

On 01/26/2010 07:24 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 03:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> The main question is where does it belong?
>>
>> a) built into qemu
>> b) built as separate tool, but shipped with qemu
>> c) completely separate
>>
>> I'm personally leaning towards a. That way we can reuse the detection
>> code and give help when an option is used that doesn't work.
>>
>
> Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the
> topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to
> integrate that functionality as well).

I'm not sure I agree. It would use no code from qemu and really benefit
in no way from being part of qemu. I don't feel that strongly about it
though.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori