From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: load|save_guest_segment_descriptor() should return X86EMUL_* values
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:30:23 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100129213023.GD18360@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100128230130.3d24a46e.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:01:30PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> These two functions should return X86EMUL_* values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I think it would be best to improve the return values here (as
documented in kvm_emulate.h).
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index ac8672f..78b8ddb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4663,7 +4663,7 @@ static int load_guest_segment_descriptor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 selector,
>
> if (dtable.limit < index * 8 + 7) {
> kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, GP_VECTOR, selector & 0xfffc);
> - return 1;
> + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> }
This should be X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT so the #GP is injected (and error
not propagated to caller).
> return kvm_read_guest_virt(dtable.base + index*8, seg_desc, sizeof(*seg_desc), vcpu);
> }
> @@ -4678,7 +4678,7 @@ static int save_guest_segment_descriptor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 selector,
> get_segment_descriptor_dtable(vcpu, selector, &dtable);
>
> if (dtable.limit < index * 8 + 7)
> - return 1;
> + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> return kvm_write_guest_virt(dtable.base + index*8, seg_desc, sizeof(*seg_desc), vcpu);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-28 13:51 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Cleanups: X86EMUL_* related Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-01-28 13:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Use X86EMUL_* to check the return value from read_std Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-01-29 20:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: These functions should return X86EMUL_* not 0 or 1 or Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-01-29 21:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: Restrict rc values in x86_emulate_insn to X86EMUL_* values Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-01-29 21:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: load|save_guest_segment_descriptor() should return " Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-01-29 21:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-01-28 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Fix the usage of X86EMUL_* values in x86.c Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-01-29 21:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100129213023.GD18360@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox