From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Fix x86 emulator's fault propagations Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:27:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20100210152757.GH24949@redhat.com> References: <20100210104541.e0f1fdd1.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45108 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753676Ab0BJP2B (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:28:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100210104541.e0f1fdd1.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:45:41AM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > My motivation: What I want to achive by this > work is to make the basic style of x86 emulator > better for the following developments. Actually > unless we handle the fault properly, our works > implementing each instruction's emulation may > end up with no effect. Why do you want to emulate every instruction? -- Gleb.