From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Fix x86 emulator's fault propagations Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:58:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20100210165853.GD2995@redhat.com> References: <20100210104541.e0f1fdd1.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4B72E561.5090408@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa , mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46955 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754801Ab0BJQ64 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:58:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B72E561.5090408@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:57:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/10/2010 03:45 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > >This patch set consists of macro replacements > >and some fixes of fault handling in the x86 > >emulator. > > > > > >Suggested by Marcelo, I separated these two > >works and tried to make it clear what effects > >each patch will produce: if you think that > >reordering something in this series makes your > >maintainance easier, I am willing to do so. > > > > > >My motivation: What I want to achive by this > >work is to make the basic style of x86 emulator > >better for the following developments. Actually > >unless we handle the fault properly, our works > >implementing each instruction's emulation may > >end up with no effect. > > Patches 2-8 look fine, but I'd like Gleb to review them as well. > I will do, but I already see that they need to be rebased onto the latest master. -- Gleb.