From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:43:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100214124343.GK2511@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B77EF0D.4050303@web.de>
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 01:39:41PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 02/14/2010 12:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> event_exit_inst_len is only used for event reinjection. Since event
> >>>> intercepted here will not be reinjected why updating
> >>>> event_exit_inst_len
> >>>> is needed here?
> >>>>
> >>> In guest debugging mode a #BP exception is always reported to user space
> >>> to find out what caused it. If it was the guest itself, the exception is
> >>> reinjected, on older kernels via KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG and since 2.6.33
> >>> via KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS (the latter requires some qemu patch that I will
> >>> post later).
> >>>
> >>> As we currently do not update event_exit_inst_len on #BP exits,
> >>> reinjecting fails unless event_exit_inst_len happens to be 1 from some
> >>> other exit.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Hmm, how does it work on SVM then where we do not have
> >> event_exit_inst_len so execution will resume on the same rip that caused
> >> #BP after event reinjection?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Note, newer AMDs do have such a field (nRIP, 0xC8). We need to support
> > older machines, though.
> >
>
> Nice.
>
> [ /me goes updating his manual - September 07... ]
>
I can't find nothing newer then that. What is the link?
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-14 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-13 9:31 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 7:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 10:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 10:34 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 10:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 11:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 11:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 14:16 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 16:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 16:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 17:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 6:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 14:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 16:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 16:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 17:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 17:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 17:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 13:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 13:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-15 14:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 11:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 11:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 11:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 12:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 10:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 11:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 13:03 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 15:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 16:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 11:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 11:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 12:27 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 12:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 12:43 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-02-14 12:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 12:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 13:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100214124343.GK2511@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox