From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:53:49 +0200
Message-ID: <20100214125349.GL2511@redhat.com>
References: <4B767160.4070609@web.de>
 <20100214075303.GF2511@redhat.com>
 <4B77CFD7.9080504@web.de>
 <20100214103445.GH2511@redhat.com>
 <4B77EC14.4000302@redhat.com>
 <4B77EF0D.4050303@web.de>
 <20100214124343.GK2511@redhat.com>
 <4B77F0EB.1050702@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38983 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758514Ab0BNMxv (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:53:51 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B77F0EB.1050702@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:47:39PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/14/2010 02:43 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>
> >>Nice.
> >>
> >>[ /me goes updating his manual - September 07... ]
> >>
> >I can't find nothing newer then that. What is the link?
> 
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_875_7044,00.html
> 
It looks like SVM's nRIP is not the same as VMX's instruction length
that is used during soft event injection. nRIP is VMEXIT things
and we need VMENTRY thing.

--
			Gleb.