From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Add instruction length to VCPU event state
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:38:04 +0200
Message-ID: <20100214143804.GM2511@redhat.com>
References: <4B76762C.10107@web.de>
 <20100213152635.GA2511@redhat.com>
 <4B76E638.5010100@web.de>
 <20100213182253.GB2511@redhat.com>
 <4B76F25F.1060009@web.de>
 <20100213190615.GC2511@redhat.com>
 <4B76FB89.50107@web.de>
 <4B77FE47.8010501@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55406 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750819Ab0BNOiJ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:38:09 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B77FE47.8010501@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/13/2010 08:20 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >But I still fail to see the case where event_exit_inst_len is set to
> >anything but 1 or 2 and where it is related to anything else than exits
> >at INT3, INT X, or INTO.
> 
> What about BOUND?  (I want to hide for suggesting anyone uses that
> instruction).
> 
It is fault not a trap IIRC.

--
			Gleb.