From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:52:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216075259.GW2995@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79170b70424440dfbede5b6eac85f734aa8785e8.1266257833.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> When in guest debugging mode, we have to reinject those #BP software
> exceptions that are caused by guest-injected INT3. As older AMD
> processors to not support the required nRIP VMCB field, try to emulate
> it by moving RIP by one on injection. Fix it up again in case the
> injection failed and we were able to catch this. This does not work for
> unintercepted faults, but it is better than doing nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 52f78dd..f63f1db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> #define SVM_FEATURE_NPT (1 << 0)
> #define SVM_FEATURE_LBRV (1 << 1)
> #define SVM_FEATURE_SVML (1 << 2)
> +#define SVM_FEATURE_NRIP (1 << 3)
> #define SVM_FEATURE_PAUSE_FILTER (1 << 10)
>
> #define NESTED_EXIT_HOST 0 /* Exit handled on host level */
> @@ -109,6 +110,8 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
> struct nested_state nested;
>
> bool nmi_singlestep;
> +
> + bool int3_injected;
> };
>
> /* enable NPT for AMD64 and X86 with PAE */
> @@ -234,23 +237,6 @@ static void svm_set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
> vcpu->arch.efer = efer;
> }
>
> -static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
> - bool has_error_code, u32 error_code)
> -{
> - struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> -
> - /* If we are within a nested VM we'd better #VMEXIT and let the
> - guest handle the exception */
> - if (nested_svm_check_exception(svm, nr, has_error_code, error_code))
> - return;
> -
> - svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr
> - | SVM_EVTINJ_VALID
> - | (has_error_code ? SVM_EVTINJ_VALID_ERR : 0)
> - | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_EXEPT;
> - svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = error_code;
> -}
> -
> static int is_external_interrupt(u32 info)
> {
> info &= SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_MASK | SVM_EVTINJ_VALID;
> @@ -296,6 +282,36 @@ static void skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> svm_set_interrupt_shadow(vcpu, 0);
> }
>
> +static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
> + bool has_error_code, u32 error_code)
> +{
> + struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +
> + /* If we are within a nested VM we'd better #VMEXIT and let the
> + guest handle the exception */
> + if (nested_svm_check_exception(svm, nr, has_error_code, error_code))
> + return;
> +
> + if (nr == BP_VECTOR && !svm_has(SVM_FEATURE_NRIP)) {
> + /*
> + * For guest debugging where we have to reinject #BP if some
> + * INT3 is guest-owned:
> + * Emulate nRIP by moving RIP one forward. Will fail if
> + * injection raises a fault that is not intercepted. Still
> + * better than failing in all cases.
> + */
> + svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 1;
> + skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
if next_rip is zero skip_emulated_instruction() decodes instruction by
itself to properly calculate next rip so no need to guess instruction
length.
> + svm->int3_injected = true;
> + }
> +
> + svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr
> + | SVM_EVTINJ_VALID
> + | (has_error_code ? SVM_EVTINJ_VALID_ERR : 0)
> + | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_EXEPT;
> + svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = error_code;
> +}
> +
> static int has_svm(void)
> {
> const char *msg;
> @@ -2653,6 +2669,9 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> if (is_nested(svm))
> break;
> if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vector))
> + if (vector == BP_VECTOR && svm->int3_injected)
> + kvm_rip_write(&svm->vcpu,
> + kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) - 1);
You don't even check current rip? So if fault happens during unrelated #BP you move
rip backwards and restart.
> break;
> if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) {
> u32 err = svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err;
> @@ -2667,6 +2686,7 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> default:
> break;
> }
> + svm->int3_injected =false;
Looks like the wrong place to clear this. It should be cleared on every
exit, not only with valid vectoring info.
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> --
> 1.6.0.2
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-16 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-15 18:17 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SVM improvements around INT3 and NMI Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3 Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 7:52 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-02-16 8:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Make stepping out of NMI handlers more robust Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 8:04 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 9:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 9:34 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 9:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 9:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 10:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 10:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 13:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 19:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18 7:52 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100216075259.GW2995@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox