public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:52:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216075259.GW2995@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79170b70424440dfbede5b6eac85f734aa8785e8.1266257833.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> When in guest debugging mode, we have to reinject those #BP software
> exceptions that are caused by guest-injected INT3. As older AMD
> processors to not support the required nRIP VMCB field, try to emulate
> it by moving RIP by one on injection. Fix it up again in case the
> injection failed and we were able to catch this. This does not work for
> unintercepted faults, but it is better than doing nothing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 52f78dd..f63f1db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define SVM_FEATURE_NPT  (1 << 0)
>  #define SVM_FEATURE_LBRV (1 << 1)
>  #define SVM_FEATURE_SVML (1 << 2)
> +#define SVM_FEATURE_NRIP (1 << 3)
>  #define SVM_FEATURE_PAUSE_FILTER (1 << 10)
>  
>  #define NESTED_EXIT_HOST	0	/* Exit handled on host level */
> @@ -109,6 +110,8 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
>  	struct nested_state nested;
>  
>  	bool nmi_singlestep;
> +
> +	bool int3_injected;
>  };
>  
>  /* enable NPT for AMD64 and X86 with PAE */
> @@ -234,23 +237,6 @@ static void svm_set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
>  	vcpu->arch.efer = efer;
>  }
>  
> -static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
> -				bool has_error_code, u32 error_code)
> -{
> -	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> -
> -	/* If we are within a nested VM we'd better #VMEXIT and let the
> -	   guest handle the exception */
> -	if (nested_svm_check_exception(svm, nr, has_error_code, error_code))
> -		return;
> -
> -	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr
> -		| SVM_EVTINJ_VALID
> -		| (has_error_code ? SVM_EVTINJ_VALID_ERR : 0)
> -		| SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_EXEPT;
> -	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = error_code;
> -}
> -
>  static int is_external_interrupt(u32 info)
>  {
>  	info &= SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_MASK | SVM_EVTINJ_VALID;
> @@ -296,6 +282,36 @@ static void skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	svm_set_interrupt_shadow(vcpu, 0);
>  }
>  
> +static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
> +				bool has_error_code, u32 error_code)
> +{
> +	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +
> +	/* If we are within a nested VM we'd better #VMEXIT and let the
> +	   guest handle the exception */
> +	if (nested_svm_check_exception(svm, nr, has_error_code, error_code))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (nr == BP_VECTOR && !svm_has(SVM_FEATURE_NRIP)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * For guest debugging where we have to reinject #BP if some
> +		 * INT3 is guest-owned:
> +		 * Emulate nRIP by moving RIP one forward. Will fail if
> +		 * injection raises a fault that is not intercepted. Still
> +		 * better than failing in all cases.
> +		 */
> +		svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 1;
> +		skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
if next_rip is zero skip_emulated_instruction() decodes instruction by
itself to properly calculate next rip so no need to guess instruction
length.

> +		svm->int3_injected = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr
> +		| SVM_EVTINJ_VALID
> +		| (has_error_code ? SVM_EVTINJ_VALID_ERR : 0)
> +		| SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_EXEPT;
> +	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = error_code;
> +}
> +
>  static int has_svm(void)
>  {
>  	const char *msg;
> @@ -2653,6 +2669,9 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  		if (is_nested(svm))
>  			break;
>  		if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vector))
> +			if (vector == BP_VECTOR && svm->int3_injected)
> +				kvm_rip_write(&svm->vcpu,
> +					      kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) - 1);
You don't even check current rip? So if fault happens during unrelated #BP you move
rip backwards and restart.

>  			break;
>  		if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) {
>  			u32 err = svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err;
> @@ -2667,6 +2686,7 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  	default:
>  		break;
>  	}
> +	svm->int3_injected =false;
Looks like the wrong place to clear this. It should be cleared on every
exit, not only with valid vectoring info.

>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -- 
> 1.6.0.2

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-16  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15 18:17 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SVM improvements around INT3 and NMI Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3 Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  7:52   ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-02-16  8:02     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  9:50   ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Make stepping out of NMI handlers more robust Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  8:04   ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16  9:14     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  9:34       ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16  9:45         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  9:49           ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 10:05             ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16 10:08               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 13:49                 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 19:16                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18  7:52                     ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100216075259.GW2995@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox