public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:24:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216082455.GY2995@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7A51D4.1040701@web.de>

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:05:40AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:53:04PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> We intercept #BP while in guest debugging mode. As VM exits due to
> >> intercepted exceptions do not necessarily come with valid
> >> idt_vectoring, we have to update event_exit_inst_len explicitly in such
> >> cases. At least in the absence of migration, this ensures that
> >> re-injections of #BP will find and use the correct instruction length.
> >>
> > Thinking about it some more. Why do we exit to userspace at all if we
> > intercept wrong #DB? It seams to me not wise to have ability to inject
> > exceptions from userspace. Exceptions generation mechanism is a part of
> > CPU and we shouldn't outsource part of CPU functionality to userspace.
> 
> The guest debugging API was design to avoid maintaining a "countless"
> number of breakpoints in kernel space and instead chose to loop over
> user space to decide about #DB & #BP. So this part is required even if
> we start thinking about an alternative interface in the future.
> 
How much is "countless"? 10000? I am sure we can handle this.

> Jan
> 
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>  - added comments
> >>
> >>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   13 +++++++++++++
> >>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >> index f82b072..14873b9 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >> @@ -2775,6 +2775,12 @@ static int handle_rmode_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>  		kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, vec);
> >>  		return 1;
> >>  	case BP_VECTOR:
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * Update instruction length as we may reinject the exception
> >> +		 * from user space while in guest debugging mode.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		to_vmx(vcpu)->vcpu.arch.event_exit_inst_len =
> >> +			vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_INSTRUCTION_LEN);
> >>  		if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP)
> >>  			return 0;
> >>  		/* fall through */
> >> @@ -2897,6 +2903,13 @@ static int handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>  		kvm_run->debug.arch.dr7 = vmcs_readl(GUEST_DR7);
> >>  		/* fall through */
> >>  	case BP_VECTOR:
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * Update instruction length as we may reinject #BP from
> >> +		 * user space while in guest debugging mode. Reading it for
> >> +		 * #DB as well causes no harm, it is not used in that case.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		vmx->vcpu.arch.event_exit_inst_len =
> >> +			vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_INSTRUCTION_LEN);
> >>  		kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> >>  		kvm_run->debug.arch.pc = vmcs_readl(GUEST_CS_BASE) + rip;
> >>  		kvm_run->debug.arch.exception = ex_no;
> > 
> > --
> > 			Gleb.
> 



--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-16  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15 14:53 [PATCH v2] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  7:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16  8:05   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-16  8:24     ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-02-16  9:11       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 10:43         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 11:13           ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 11:16             ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 11:23               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 13:12                 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 19:17                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18  7:35                     ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100216082455.GY2995@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox