From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:16:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100218161637.GP22141@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7D4368.6020903@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:40:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/18/2010 01:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >Use of kmap_atomic disables preemption but if we run in
> >shadow-shadow mode the vmrun emulation executes kvm_set_cr3
> >which might sleep or fault. So use kmap instead for
> >nested_svm_map.
> >
> >
> >
> >-static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
> >+static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr)
> > {
> > struct page *page;
> >
> >@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
> >
> > page = kmap_atomic_to_page(addr);
> >
> >- kunmap_atomic(addr, idx);
> >+ kunmap(addr);
> > kvm_release_page_dirty(page);
> > }
>
> kunmap() takes a struct page *, not the virtual address (a
> consistent source of bugs).
Ah true, thanks. I'll fix that.
> kmap() is generally an unloved interface, it is slow and possibly
> deadlock prone, but it's better than sleeping in atomic context. If
> you can hack your way around it, that is preferred.
Best would be to use kvm_read_guest, but I fear that this will have an
performance impact. Maybe I'll try this and measure if it really has a
significant performance impact.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-18 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 11:38 [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:16 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Fix wrong interrupt injection in enable_irq_windows Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Sync all control registers on nested vmexit Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Annotate nested_svm_map with might_sleep() Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Fix nested msr intercept handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Don't sync nested cr8 to lapic and back Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Activate nested state only when guest state is complete Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:30 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Remove newlines from nested trace points Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:33 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100218161637.GP22141@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox