From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:24:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100218162418.GQ22141@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7D4614.7040806@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:52:20PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/18/2010 01:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >Move the actual vmexit routine out of code that runs with
> >irqs and preemption disabled.
> >
> >Cc: stable@kernel.org
> >Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> >---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> >index 7c96b8b..25d26ec 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> >@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void svm_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> >
> > static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> >+static int nested_svm_exit_handled_atomic(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> > static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> > static int nested_svm_check_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned nr,
> > bool has_error_code, u32 error_code);
> >@@ -1386,7 +1387,7 @@ static int nested_svm_check_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned nr,
> > svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = error_code;
> > svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr2;
> >
> >- return nested_svm_exit_handled(svm);
> >+ return nested_svm_exit_handled_atomic(svm);
> > }
>
> What do you say to
>
>
> if (nested_svm_intercepts(svm))
> svm->nested.exit_required = true;
>
> here, and recoding nested_svm_exit_handled() to call
> nested_svm_intercepts()? I think it improves readability a little
> by avoiding a function that changes behaviour according to how it is
> called.
Thats a good idea, will change that. It improves readability.
> Long term, we may want to split out the big switch into the
> individual handlers, to avoid decoding the exit reason twice.
I don't think thats a good idea. The nested exit handling is at the
beginning of svm_handle_exit to hide the nested vcpu state from the kvm
logic which may not be aware of nesting at all. My rationale is that the
host hypervisor don't see any exits that needs to be reinjected to the
l1 hypervisor.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-18 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 11:38 [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Fix wrong interrupt injection in enable_irq_windows Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:24 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Sync all control registers on nested vmexit Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Annotate nested_svm_map with might_sleep() Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Fix nested msr intercept handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Don't sync nested cr8 to lapic and back Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Activate nested state only when guest state is complete Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:30 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Remove newlines from nested trace points Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:33 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100218162418.GQ22141@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox