From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Preserve injected TF across emulation
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:03:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100223110301.GJ29041@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B83B0B8.2090308@siemens.com>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:40:56AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:51:22PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> Call directly into the vendor services for getting/setting rflags in
> >>>> emulate_instruction to ensure injected TF survives the emulation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
> >>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >>>> index e2e03a4..19e8b28 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >>>> @@ -3468,7 +3468,7 @@ int emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>>> kvm_x86_ops->get_cs_db_l_bits(vcpu, &cs_db, &cs_l);
> >>>>
> >>>> vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.vcpu = vcpu;
> >>>> - vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.eflags = kvm_get_rflags(vcpu);
> >>>> + vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.eflags = kvm_x86_ops->get_rflags(vcpu);
> >>> So now emulator runs with injected TF? Hmm, then may be emulator should
> >>> inject DB when appropriate and caller of emulate_instruction() should
> >>> emulate DB intercept if external debugging is going on?
> >> That is what patch 6 aims at, both for external as well as
> >> guest-internal debugging.
> >>
> > It does at the wrong level. It tries to do it above emulator, but only emulator
> > knows what is the sate of instruction emulation and when emulation is completed.
> > If at this point TF is set it inject DB trap. The code above checks if
> > DB intercept is enabled when DB is injected and calls usual DB intercept
> > path.
>
> Sorry, can't follow, your description does not match the above code for me.
>
> This patch just ensures that we do not loose TF across emulation and, by
> itself, already improves guest debugging: it allows to step over
> emulated blocks with one instruction offset. And it has no side effects
> as the emulator does not evaluate TF yet (before patch 6).
>
My comment was not about this patch, but about patch 6. This is the job
of emulator to emulate CPU and inject exceptions/traps, not the code above
it.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 17:51 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Enhancements and fixes around guest debugging Jan Kiszka
2010-02-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP Jan Kiszka
2010-02-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3 Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 10:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 10:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 10:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: Add KVM_CAP_X86_ROBUST_SINGLESTEP Jan Kiszka
2010-02-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: Drop RF manipulation for guest single-stepping Jan Kiszka
2010-02-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Preserve injected TF across emulation Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 10:00 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 10:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 10:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 10:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 11:03 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-02-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: Emulator support for TF Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 9:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 10:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 10:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 10:29 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-23 10:32 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 10:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-23 10:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 11:00 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 11:04 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-23 11:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 11:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-23 12:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 12:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-23 12:02 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100223110301.GJ29041@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox