From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix segfault with ram_size > 4095M without kvm
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:24:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100223212426.GC24081@volta.aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B844388.9080705@codemonkey.ws>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:07:20PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/23/2010 02:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >>Ryan Harper a écrit :
> >>>Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use> 4095M memsize.
> >>>This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
> >>>32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
> >>>not using kvm
> >>>
> >>>Upstream qemu-kvm is affected if using the -no-kvm option; this patch address
> >>>the segfault there as well.
> >>It looks like workarounding the real bug. At some point both
> >>i386-softmmu (via PAE) and x86_64-softmmu were able to support> 4GB of
> >>memory. I remember adding the support long time ago, and testing it with
> >>32GB of emulated RAM.
> >Sounds like a perfect candidate for -stable then. For HEAD I agree that finding the cause would be the way to go.
>
> No, it's wrong. A good candidate for -stable would be something
> that fixes the SEGV :-)
>
It actually depends on the patch and how invasive it is.
I'll bisect that later this week. For now what I can say it hasn't
worked for a lot of time. It works in 0.9.1, but not in 0.10.0. It
probably hasn't been noticed due to kqemu which was limiting the
size to 2GB.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-23 15:13 [PATCH] Fix segfault with ram_size > 4095M without kvm Ryan Harper
2010-02-23 17:02 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-02-23 20:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2010-02-23 21:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-23 21:24 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2010-02-23 22:55 ` Ryan Harper
2010-03-04 21:27 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-03-04 21:34 ` Ryan Harper
2010-03-06 21:31 ` Aurelien Jarno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100223212426.GC24081@volta.aurel32.net \
--to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox