From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: x86: Restrict writeback of VCPU state
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:59:13 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100224225913.GA16246@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09d3dc5c4cc2a36e61d2584b1b706143b9ce7765.1267021065.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:17:53PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Do not write nmi_pending, sipi_vector, and mpstate unless we at least go
> through a reset. And TSC as well as KVM wallclocks should only be
> written on full sync, otherwise we risk to drop some time on during
> state read-modify-write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
> kvm.h | 2 +-
> qemu-kvm-x86.c | 2 +-
> target-i386/kvm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> target-i386/machine.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kvm.h b/kvm.h
> index 3ec5b59..3ee307d 100644
> --- a/kvm.h
> +++ b/kvm.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int kvm_log_stop(target_phys_addr_t phys_addr, ram_addr_t size);
> int kvm_has_sync_mmu(void);
> int kvm_has_vcpu_events(void);
> int kvm_has_robust_singlestep(void);
> -int kvm_put_vcpu_events(CPUState *env);
> +int kvm_put_vcpu_events(CPUState *env, int level);
> int kvm_get_vcpu_events(CPUState *env);
>
> void kvm_cpu_register_phys_memory_client(void);
> diff --git a/qemu-kvm-x86.c b/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> index 4e6ae70..b0f9670 100644
> --- a/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> +++ b/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> @@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ void kvm_arch_push_nmi(void *opaque)
> void kvm_arch_cpu_reset(CPUState *env)
> {
> kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(env);
> - kvm_put_vcpu_events(env);
> + kvm_put_vcpu_events(env, KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE);
> kvm_reset_mpstate(env);
> if (!cpu_is_bsp(env) && !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD;
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 5f0829b..f1f44d3 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static void kvm_msr_entry_set(struct kvm_msr_entry *entry,
> entry->data = value;
> }
>
> -static int kvm_put_msrs(CPUState *env)
> +static int kvm_put_msrs(CPUState *env, int level)
> {
> struct {
> struct kvm_msrs info;
> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(CPUState *env)
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP, env->sysenter_eip);
> if (kvm_has_msr_star(env))
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_STAR, env->star);
> - kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_TSC, env->tsc);
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA, env->vm_hsave);
> #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> /* FIXME if lm capable */
> @@ -564,8 +563,12 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(CPUState *env)
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_FMASK, env->fmask);
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_LSTAR, env->lstar);
> #endif
> - kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME, env->system_time_msr);
> - kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK, env->wall_clock_msr);
> + if (level == KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE) {
> + kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_TSC, env->tsc);
> + kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME,
> + env->system_time_msr);
> + kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK, env->wall_clock_msr);
> + }
>
> msr_data.info.nmsrs = n;
>
> @@ -783,7 +786,7 @@ static int kvm_get_mp_state(CPUState *env)
> }
> #endif
>
> -int kvm_put_vcpu_events(CPUState *env)
> +int kvm_put_vcpu_events(CPUState *env, int level)
> {
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS
> struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
> @@ -807,8 +810,11 @@ int kvm_put_vcpu_events(CPUState *env)
>
> events.sipi_vector = env->sipi_vector;
>
> - events.flags =
> - KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR;
> + events.flags = 0;
> + if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
> + events.flags |=
> + KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR;
> + }
>
> return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(env, KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, &events);
What is the reason for write-back of any vcpu-event state for RUNTIME
case again?
The debug workaround?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-24 14:17 [PATCH v3 00/10] qemu-kvm: Hook cleanups and yet more use of upstream code Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] qemu-kvm: Add KVM_CAP_X86_ROBUST_SINGLESTEP-awareness Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] qemu-kvm: Rework VCPU state writeback API Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] x86: Extend validity of cpu_is_bsp Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] qemu-kvm: Clean up mpstate synchronization Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 22:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-25 0:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-25 11:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-25 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: x86: Restrict writeback of VCPU state Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 22:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-02-24 23:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] qemu-kvm: Use VCPU event state for reset and vmsave/load Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] qemu-kvm: Cleanup/fix TSC and PV clock writeback Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 23:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-24 23:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 23:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-24 23:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-25 3:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-25 8:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-25 15:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-25 15:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-25 15:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] qemu-kvm: Clean up KVM's APIC hooks Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] qemu-kvm: Move kvm_set_boot_cpu_id Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 14:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] qemu-kvm: Bring qemu_init_vcpu back home Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 23:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] qemu-kvm: Hook cleanups and yet more use of upstream code Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-24 23:55 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100224225913.GA16246@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox