From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] uq/master: irqchip-in-kernel support
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 12:19:34 -0300
Message-ID: <20100301151934.GA3128@amt.cnet>
References: <1267215141-13629-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
 <4B88F3B4.9050809@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11987 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751448Ab0CAPT6 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:19:58 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B88F3B4.9050809@web.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:28:04AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > This is the same in-kernel irqchip support already posted to qemu-devel,
> > just rebased, retested, etc. It passes my basic tests, so it seem to be
> > still in good shape.
> > 
> > It is provided against uq/master as part of the integration efforts
> > 
> 
> Marcelo, what do you plan to take first, this series or my uq/master
> version of the writeback rework? I have neither a problem rebasing my
> upstream patches on top of this or helping Glauber with doing it the
> other way around. I just want to avoid doing useless rebases.

Your's first.