Re: Another VNC crash, qemu-kvm-0.12.3

Chris Webb
2010-03-05T16:52:15Z

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:

> On 03/01/2010 12:14 PM, Chris Webb wrote:
> >We've just seen another VNC related qemu-kvm crash, this time an arithmetic
> >exception at vnc.c:1424 in the newly release qemu-kvm 0.12.3.
> >
> > [...]
> > 1423 if (vs->absolute) {
> > 1424 kbd_mouse_event(x * 0x7FFF / (ds_get_width(vs->ds) - 1),
> > 1425 y * 0x7FFF / (ds_get_height(vs->ds) - 1),
> > 1426 dz, buttons);
> > 1427 } else if (vnc_has_feature(vs, VNC_FEATURE_POINTER_TYPE_CHANGE)) {
> > 1428 x -= 0x7FFF;
> > [...]
> >
> >and sure enough:
> >
> > (gdb) p vs->ds->surface->width
> > $1 = 9
> > (gdb) p vs->ds->surface->height
> > $2 = 1
> >
> >What a 9x1 display surface is doing on this guest is a mystery to me, but you
> >definitely can't divide by one less than its height!
>
> Can you reproduce this reliably? If so, what's the procedure?

No, I'm afraid not, although I have had a thorough play myself with a variety
of VNC clients in an attempt to reproduce.

The background here is that we're running a public hosting service where
customers can install and run their own OSes on their own qemu-kvm virtual
machines. I don't even know what VNC client (if any) was connected at the
time. I only see the core dump if the qemu-kvm crashes.

Of course, if the screen width or height is 1, it doesn't really matter what
the value of the mouse position for the click is, so something as simple as

diff --git a/vnc.c b/vnc.c
--- a/vnc.c
+++ b/vnc.c
@@ -1421,8 +1421,10 @@
dz = 1;

if (vs->absolute) {
- kbd_mouse_event(x * 0x7FFF / (ds_get_width(vs->ds) - 1),
- y * 0x7FFF / (ds_get_height(vs->ds) - 1),
+ kbd_mouse_event(ds_get_width(vs->ds) > 1 ?
+ x * 0x7FFF / (ds_get_width(vs->ds) - 1) : 0x4000,
+ ds_get_height(vs->ds) > 1 ?
+ y * 0x7FFF / (ds_get_height(vs->ds) - 1) : 0x4000,
dz, buttons);
} else if (vnc_has_feature(vs, VNC_FEATURE_POINTER_TYPE_CHANGE)) {
x -= 0x7FFF;

will fix the symptom: the division by zero. The underlying cause of a 9x1
display surface is a bit mysterious though.

Cheers,

Chris.