From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikola Ciprich <extmaillist@linuxbox.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-aio usable?
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:27:36 +0100
Message-ID: <20100308212736.GB4731@nik-comp.linuxbox.cz>
References: <hn1ktj$5gh$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <4B94BF05.20609@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gwu.lbox.cz ([62.245.111.132]:32923 "EHLO gwu.lbox.cz"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755523Ab0CHV1x (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:27:53 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B94BF05.20609@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

> It's faster.
Hi Avi,
Could You give some rough estimate on how much faster?
I'm stuck with glibc-2.5 now, but I'm always eager to improve performance,
so I wonder if it would make sense to either port eventfd + aio stuff, or
switch to glibc-2.8 for me...



-- 
-------------------------------------
Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 596 603 142
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799

www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------