From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Treutner <thomas@scripty.at>
Subject: report stolen time via pvclock?
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:47:38 +0100
Message-ID: <201003092147.38498.thomas@scripty.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: KVM mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from static.115.55.40.188.clients.your-server.de ([188.40.55.115]:51106
	"EHLO scripty.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752695Ab0CIVON (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:14:13 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Hi,

I'm referring to this patchset

http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg23810.html

of Marcelo Tosatti. It seems it was never included or even discussed, although 
it's nearly half a year old. I wonder if there is a good reason for that? I'd 
like to use the steal time for my VMs, as I consider it useful in some cases.

Thanks,
kr,t