From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Android-virt] Ideas wiki for GSoC 2010 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:32:07 -0300 Message-ID: <20100312093207.5d2cc51b@redhat.com> References: <20100310183023.6632aece@redhat.com> <4B98A20E.4000900@redhat.com> <4B98BB2D.9020608@redhat.com> <2776773B-7B1A-4E74-A59A-4CC45D3AAE6C@suse.de> <4B98D9ED.9010005@redhat.com> <4B98DADD.9060600@redhat.com> <5C41DBE6-9905-4D2C-A230-52FF2521E6BD@suse.de> <4B98DED1.9060005@redhat.com> <7d08b87d1003120249w770ebcb6qc6c792dd76a8365b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Avi Kivity , Alexander Graf , Anthony Liguori , KVM General , Jan Kiszka , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Gerd Hoffmann , android-virt , Adam Litke , Paolo Bonzini , Natalia Portillo , Cam Macdonell To: Christoffer Dall Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32803 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751582Ab0CLMcl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:32:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7d08b87d1003120249w770ebcb6qc6c792dd76a8365b@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:49:48 +0100 Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 03/11/2010 02:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> Another idea I'd have would be upstream integration (and cleanup) = of the ARM KVM port: https://wiki.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/wiki/index.php/An= droidVirt:MainPage > >> > > > > Huh, didn't even know this thing existed. =C2=A0Definitely somethin= g to merge. >=20 > I have been wanted to announce this work for some time, but always > thought my patches were too unpolished. However, now is as good a tim= e > as any. In addition to the link provided by Alex, the sources can be > viewed on http://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/git and I'm hoping to have > something mature enough for upstream some time around the summer. I'd send RFCs early, just to be sure everything is going in the right direction. It's okay to have unpolished code in RFCs. > I'm unsure how this relates to GSoC, but let me me know how I > could/should be involved. I'm not sure either, but doesn't seem a good project if it's only polishing. On the other hand, if there's anything missing that should be implemented you can be involved by suggesting the project and becoming the mentor for it. Here is our ideas page: http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010