From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Ideas wiki for GSoC 2010 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:22:41 -0300 Message-ID: <20100312122241.5cf41093@redhat.com> References: <20100310183023.6632aece@redhat.com> <1268406691.3287.6.camel@aglitke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, agraf@suse.de To: Adam Litke Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38556 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934143Ab0CLPWz (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1268406691.3287.6.camel@aglitke> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:11:31 -0600 Adam Litke wrote: > Hi Luiz. Around the time when I introduced the new Asynchronous monitor > command API we had talked about converting all commands to use this new > API so that we can cut down on duplicate code paths and confusing code. > I would like to propose this as a GSoC project idea. Do you think it > should stand as its own project or should we merge it into your "Convert > Monitor commands to the QObject API" project? I think it's a project by itself, but I wonder if it's too easy/short for GSoC. An experienced programmer can do the conversion plus testing in a day or two. There are probably a number of cleanups and adaptions that can take more, but still seems too short.